Should Packers Extend Adams?

There’s no denying that Davante Adams is one of the top handful of wide receivers in the league. There’s also no denying that the top handful of wide receivers in the league are being paid over $20 million a year. Thus, there’s no denying that Adams is worth over $20 million a year. But that doesn’t mean the Packers should pay that kind of money to the All-Pro from Fresno State. The following are five reasons why GM Brian Gutekunst needs to think long and hard before shelling out another $80 million-plus to a veteran player:

1) Adams will turn 30 toward the end of the first year of his next contract. Of the top 20 wide receivers in terms of yards last season, not one was over the age of 28. This doesn’t mean that Adams won’t be good for the duration of his extension, but it means he probably won’t be great for the duration of his extension. The Packers have had a lot of outstanding wide receivers in recent years. The list includes Greg Jennings, James Jones, Jordy Nelson, and Randall Cobb. Those four players averaged 940 yards and 8 touchdowns in the two seasons before turning 30; they averaged 755 yards and 6 touchdowns in the two seasons after turning 30. Professional football is a young man’s game, and the Packers don’t want to be paying for a brand new Rolls Royce in 2023 and getting a 2018 model.

2) It’s been 14 years since a team won the Super Bowl with a wide receiver who was named All-Pro that same season (Indy and Marvin Harrison in 2006). Since then, only two All-Pro wide receivers even played in a Super Bowl – Kansas City’s Tyreek Hill in 2020 and Denver’s Demaryius Thomas in 2014. And of the 10 highest-paid receivers in the league a year ago, only five played for teams that qualified for the postseason. Conversely, of the 10 highest-paid corners in the league a year ago, seven played for teams that qualified for the postseason. This isn’t meant to diminish the importance of wide receivers, but some positions are simply more important than others.

3) The Packers can’t keep handing out huge extensions. Since August 2018, Gutekunst has made quarterback Aaron Rodgers, nose tackle Kenny Clark, and tackle David Bakhtiari the highest-paid players at their positions, and he’ll likely do the same with corner Jaire Alexander and perhaps edge rusher Za’Darius Smith in the near future. It’s hard to criticize these moves since any coach or general manager will tell you that those are the most important positions on a team – not to mention the most difficult to acquire. Wide receiver is a different story. Every draft is inundated with big, fast players who can catch the football. Last season, a quarter of the top 20 receivers in terms of yards were players with less than three years of NFL experience. If Gutekunst chooses the right player in a couple of weeks, the Packers should have an adequate replacement for Adams ready to go in 2022.

4) The Packers are 6-0 without Adams the past two seasons, and the offense averaged 33 points in those half dozen games.  Yes, the competition wasn’t great, and yes, playing short stretches without a star isn’t the same as playing an entire season, but 6-0 is still 6-0. Without the team’s No. 1 wide receiver, coach Matt LaFleur and his staff  adjusted by using the running backs a lot more in the passing game. Aaron Jones and Jamaal Williams, who averaged a combined 4.3 catches and 30 yards with Adams in 2019 and 2020, averaged 8.2 catches and 85 yards without him.

5) Whether Rodgers or Jordan Love is under center, it’s pretty clear LaFleur wants his offense to look different in the future. By re-signing Jones in March and drafting A.J. Dillon, Jace Sternberger, and Josiah Deguara in the past 24 months, he wants to prioritize running the ball and flooding the field with versatile tight ends and fullbacks. LaFleur wants his offense to resemble the one run in San Francisco by his friend and mentor, Kyle Shanahan. The 49ers have their money invested in the offensive line, tight end George Kittle, and fullback Kyle Juszczyk. Their highest-paid wide receiver in 2021 is Brandon Aiyuk, with a base salary of $1.18 million and a cap hit of $2.85 million. Their other starting wide receiver, Deebo Samuel, has a base salary of $1.14 million and a cap hit of $2.1 million.

Do I think the Packers will extend Adams? Yes. It’s the obvious move. Plus, aside from Bryan Bulaga and Corey Linsley, Gutekunst has re-signed every quality starter since taking over as GM. The only thing that would make me even consider the possibility of Adams not being back in 2022 would be if the Packers spend a high pick on a wide receiver in the upcoming draft. Even then, I’d still be very surprised if No. 17 isn’t locked up for another four or five years by the end of the summer. It feels inevitable. But whether that would be the right move is far less certain.

(This story was originally posted in April)

Michael Rodney

Packers Notes is the creation of Michael Rodney, who has been writing about the Green Bay Packers for over 30 years. His first blog, Packer Update, hit the internet in 2004. Before becoming a public educator, Rodney worked as a journalist for a couple of newspapers in his home state of New Jersey and covered the Philadelphia Eagles for WTXF-TV. He's had numerous articles on the Packers published, and he's been featured on both television and radio over the years.

4 thoughts on “Should Packers Extend Adams?

  1. Excellent post and you make some great points.

    I could be wrong, but the thing that makes Adams elite is his footwork. Unlike speed and quickness, his ability to set up defenders and use his feet to make defenders look silly won’t diminish significantly with age. Davante will likely lose a step or two, but as long as his footwork stays in good shape he should stay productive for quite some time.

    …or at least I hope that’s the case.

  2. Good post. I can think of another reason – availability. He’s missed several games the last two years with foot/ankle injuries. He also had a number of concussions earlier in his career – 3 over 14 months including that brutal shot vs Bears.
    The contract situations with cornerstone players in recent years makes it especially frustrating that Gutey has been so passive with secondary free agents and ineffective with the draft. I really wish we could have seen 12 with Wolf and Holmgren.

  3. I wouldn’t have paid Bakhtiari for the same reason I wouldn’t pay Adams. I’d rather have a good left tackle on a rookie contract than a great left tackle making $23 million. The Packers’ cap problems aren’t because of 12. They’re because Gutekunst signed Bakhtiari, Clark, and the Smiths to contracts worth over $300 million. Ted was able to keep most of his best players and also keep control of the cap because he usually agreed to deals that were more friendly to the team.

  4. should sign Davante to a two or three year cap friendly for this year extension with incentives if he is willing to accept it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *