Trading Love Is Right Thing To Do

The Packers don’t have to trade backup quarterback Jordan Love, but they should. The former No. 1 pick deserves a chance to at least compete for a starting job in his third season, and there are a handful of teams that would afford him that opportunity.


People who think it’s OK for Love to ride the bench for the first three years of his career point to Aaron Rodgers doing just that in Green Bay from 2005 to 2007. But that was an anomaly, and it was also a decade and a half ago. In the past 50 years, no other quarterback chosen in round 1 was forced to sit for so long before being given the opportunity to start.

While trading Love would be the right thing to do for the player, just as importantly, it would also be the right thing to do for the team. With several veterans expected to be released or not re-signed due to the salary cap, the Packers need all the picks they can get in next month’s draft. There will be many holes to fill between now and the beginning of the season.

Some, including Senior Bowl executive director Jim Nagy, believe the Packers could get a second-round pick from a quarterback-needy team like Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, or Seattle. That seems unlikely, but even a third or high fourth would be extremely helpful. Depending on what happens in the upcoming weeks, Green Bay could be looking to fill gaping holes at tight end, wide receiver, defensive end, outside linebacker, and inside linebacker, so the more picks, the better.

Of course, the Packers can’t move on from Love unless they have a capable replacement for him. Journeyman Kurt Benkert is the only other quarterback on the roster, and while he’s an All-Pro on social media, he’s better suited to be a No. 3 in the NFL. Fortunately, there’s a soon-to-be unrestricted free agent who’d be the perfect backup to Rodgers in 2022 and beyond. His name is Tim Boyle, who played for Green Bay for three seasons before signing with the Lions last March.

Boyle obviously knows coach Matt LaFleur’s offense, and he’s close friends with Rodgers. Plus, the former undrafted free agent from Eastern Kentucky gained valuable experience in his one season with Detroit. He started three games and attempted 94 passes. That’s three more starts and 90 more passes than he accumulated in his time with the Packers.

The 27-year-old Boyle went 0-3 as a starter and looked like an inexperienced backup quarterback on an awful team. His numbers weren’t very impressive (526 total yards, 3 touchdowns, and 6 interceptions), but he showed poise, toughness, a strong right arm, and the ability to make plays under pressure. Surround Boyle with more talent and better coaching, and he’d be at least an average No. 2. He’s also somebody who’d likely accept that role for multiple seasons.

Would Boyle actually be an upgrade over Love? That’s difficult to say, but it’s certainly possible in the short term. He’d also come cheaply, which is important for a team that’s currently $50 million over the cap and will be counting every penny in the upcoming weeks. Boyle made $2.5 million last season, and it’s unlikely he’d be offered more on the open market.


There are only two reasons not to trade Love. The first is if Gutekunst believes there’s a decent chance 2022 could be Rodgers’ last season. And while it’s hard to believe the Packers would turn down a deal similar to the one the Seahawks got for Russell Wilson for one last run at the Super Bowl, you never know. The second is if no team offers reasonable compensation for Love, and reasonable means at least a third this year or a fourth this year and a conditional pick in 2023.

DONATE TO PACKERS NOTES

[yop_poll id=”47″]

Avatar photo

Michael Rodney

Packers Notes is the creation of Michael Rodney, who has been writing about the Green Bay Packers for over 30 years. His first blog, Packer Update, hit the internet in 2004. Before becoming a public educator, Rodney worked as a journalist for a couple of newspapers in his home state of New Jersey and covered the Philadelphia Eagles for WTXF-TV. He's had numerous articles on the Packers published, and he's been featured on both television and radio over the years.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CJS
CJS
March 10, 2022 1:59 pm

100% agree Love should be traded, but I’d try to trade him for a proven player if possible. Ideally a WR or TE.

Bryan
Bryan
March 10, 2022 2:45 pm

I would keep him. Unless the coaches have given up on him, of course.

What guarantee do we have that Rodgers will stay healthy this year? Wouldn’t Love be a better alternative than anyone brought in on the cheap?

Do you put any stock in Andrew Brandt’s theory that Rodgers is still year to year, despite the new deal? His reasoning is Aaron is one year from full fledged free agency, why would he give that up?

Scott
Scott
March 10, 2022 3:47 pm

I know the NFL is a business, but I’d also like to see Love get a chance to play. Imagine working hard your entire life, getting drafted in the first round, and then having to sit on the bench for three years. I know Rodgers did it, but I’m sure he wasn’t happy. Plus, Favre never signed a 4-year extension while Rodgers was waiting his turn.

eric
eric
March 10, 2022 7:09 pm

on one hand, pretty much every media’s narrative on Love is indicating that the young quarterback’s stock is near/at an all time low. if the Packers can’t get at least an attractive Day 2 pick for Love, perhaps another year behind Rodgers is what is best for Love’s stock and the organization. also, another year as Rodgers’ understudy may be what would nurture Love’s best opportunity for his future success.

on the other hand, there is clear demand for a young, developing and promising QB in the league right now. for example, isn’t Indianapolis looking for a QB RIGHT NOW? and, oh: wasn’t the justification for moving up in the 1st round in 2020 due to interest in Love from the Colts? maybe there is already something in the works.

Royce
Royce
March 10, 2022 7:24 pm

I’m thinking a GM would prefer making a trade now rather than in a year so he could see Love for a season before having to decide whether to pick up his fifth-year option.

Bruce
Bruce
March 11, 2022 2:45 pm

I don’t think Gutekunst will trade Love unless his agent makes a big stink. Even then, I’m not sure he’d make a deal unless he gets back at least a 2nd round pick and I don’t see that happening.

Steve
Steve
March 12, 2022 7:10 pm

I would not trade Love this year. It will cost us more cap space to sign some vet, and Benkert is not the answer. Love has experience in the Packer system and should be the backup again this year. I’m not really concerned about Love’s feelings this year – we need to do what’s best for the team.

I have a bad feeling about the fact that Rodgers has not signed the extension – if he still wants the opt-out after the 2022 season we’re in deep trouble with the current year cap and maybe can’t afford Rodgers / Adams w/o releasing a lot of veterans. ps – if Rodgers won’t give up the opt-out after this year, I would have traded him – maybe too late now.

7
0
Please share your thoughts with a comment!x
()
x