I‘ve never been a big fan of mock drafts, but people seem to love them. So here’s my first effort at predicting what will happen in exactly three weeks. The Packers pick 22nd and 28th, and while Brian Gutekunst will talk about taking the best player available, the reality is he’s going to try to fill needs – just like all GMs do every year. That means expect a big guy and a fast guy to be the choices when Commissioner Roger Goodell steps to the podium in Las Vegas.
The following are the 21 players I project to be off the board when the Packers make their pick at No. 22. Of course, there’s also a pretty good chance Gutekunst will trade up or down in the first round for the fourth time in the past five Aprils:
POSITION | PLAYER | COLLEGE |
---|---|---|
QB | Kenny Pickett | Pittsburgh |
QB | Malik Willis | Liberty |
WR | Drake London | USC |
WR | Chris Olave | Ohio St. |
WR | Jameson Williams | Alabama |
WR | Garrett Wilson | Ohio St. |
OT | Charles Cross | Mississippi St. |
OT | Ikem Ekwonu | North Carolina St. |
OT | Evan Neal | Alabama |
OT | Trevor Penning | Northern Iowa |
DL | Jordan Davis | Georgia |
DL | Aidan Hutchinson | Michigan |
DL | Kayvon Thibodeaux | Oregon |
DL | Travon Walker | Georgia |
EDGE | Jermaine Johnson | Florida St. |
EDGE | George Karlaftis | Purdue |
ILB | Devin Lloyd | Utah |
CB | Ahmad Gardner | Cincinnati |
CB | Trent McDuffie | Washington |
CB | Derek Stingley Jr. | LSU |
S | Kyle Hamilton | Notre Dame |
Assuming the 21 players listed above are no longer options for the Packers at 22, here are 16 more players who would be:
POSITION | PLAYER | COLLEGE |
---|---|---|
WR | Treylon Burks | Arkansas |
WR | Jahan Dotson | Penn St. |
WR | George Pickens | Georgia |
WR | Christian Watson | North Dakota St. |
OL | Kenyon Green | Texas A&M |
OL | Zion Johnson | Boston College |
OL | Tyler Linderbaum | Iowa |
OL | Bernhard Raimann | Central Michigan |
DL | Devonte Wyatt | Georgia |
EDGE | Arnold Ebiketie | Penn St. |
EDGE | Boye Mafe | Minnesota |
EDGE | David Ojabo | Michigan |
LB | Nakobe Dean | Georgia |
CB | Andrew Booth Jr. | Clemson |
CB | Kyler Gordon | Washington |
S | Daxton Hill | Michigan |
It’s really difficult to predict what Gutekunst might do without knowing exactly which players will be available at 22 and 28. That’s why I dislike mock drafts, especially ones done in early April. But for the sake of this particular exercise, let’s assume the 21 players listed above are the first 21 players off the board. Let’s also assume the Packers don’t trade up or down with either of their picks. Now that we’ve agreed to suspend reality, let’s take an educated guess at what could happen.
Wide receiver is obviously the No. 1 need for Green Bay but why take the fifth-best player at that position when better prospects are available? Wyatt would be difficult to pass up if he gets to 22, which is far from a certainty. Gutekunst hasn’t drafted a single defensive lineman before Day 3 since taking over as general manager in 2018, so it’s well past time.
If Wyatt isn’t available, Gutekunst could take the best available receiver, but is either Burks or Dotson worth the 22nd pick? I don’t think so. If the man that matters feels the same way, Raimann, Ebiketie, and Mafe could enter the picture. The former is a tackle who tests extremely well, and the latter two are edge rushers who test even better. Gutekunst loves to take athletic freaks in the first round, and these three intriguing prospects play positions that could use more depth.
If Gutekunst doesn’t take a wide receiver at 22, he almost has to take one with his next pick, whether at 28 or early in the second round following a trade down. This is where Burks or Dotson would make a lot more sense. If a receiver goes at 22, Raimann, Ebiketie, and Mafe would be in play at 28. I’d lean toward Ebiketie, who reminds me of Rashan Gary.
AND THE PACKERS SELECT… Georgia defensive lineman Devonte Wyatt and Penn State wide receiver Jahan Dotson.
Aside from Pro Bowl nose tackle Kenny Clark, the Packers haven’t had much success drafting D-linemen in the early rounds in recent years. But Wyatt is a better prospect than Justin Harrell, Mike Neal, Jerel Worthy, Khyri Thornton, Datone Jones, and Montravius Adams. Unlike some of those busts, Wyatt would actually be a good fit in the current scheme.
Based on Gutekunst’s love of big wide receivers who can run fast but have little wiggle, I’m skeptical whether he’d take Dotson (5-10 1/2, 186) over Burks, Watson, and Pickens. That said, the tape doesn’t lie. Dotson is the fifth-best wide receiver in this class, and the gap from No. 5 to No. 6 is pretty substantial. He’s also polished enough to be an instant contributor.
IF I WERE THE GM…
I’d trade a Day 2 pick for the best veteran wide receiver available at that price – someone like Seattle’s Tyler Lockett or Houston’s Brandin Cooks. I’d spend the 22nd pick on a talented big guy like Wyatt, Raimann, Ebiketie, or Mafe. And I’d trade down from 28 for more picks, including one early in round 2 that I’d use on Pickens, Watson, or Cincinnati’s Alec Pierce.
[yop_poll id=”51″]
I love the idea of getting a really solid DT in the first round. I know that’s a position that lacks depth in this draft (and on GB’s roster) so I’d be excited about getting Wyatt. Also really like the idea of getting a top-OL who could really make GB’s line a top-5 in the league, which Rodgers will need with his increased lack of mobility. (Cutting Turner remains the biggest enigma of the offseason.) But reading your analysis has me thinking even more that Gutey is aiming for a trade-up. He has to get – unless he’s in love with Watson, which I could but doesn’t have the big-school pedigree that he and Ted like – one of those top 4 WRs (and really, top 3, since I don’t think he can go with Williams given his injury). My best guess is he trades up somewhere 15-19 to get one of the OSU guys.
I am getting much more comfortable with the Packers taking a stud defensive player at 22, the D will be very solid. I tend to agree with trading down a bit and perhaps picking up another second round pick and going WR, WR and TE.
I think the Packers have to move up for one of the top wide receivers unless Gutekunst trades for a proven veteran before the draft. Giving up a 3 to get in position to draft London, Olave, or Wilson would make sense, especially when you consider how poorly Gutekunst has drafted in the third round. I just don’t think the Packers can go into next season with one of the second-tier wide receivers at the top of the depth chart.
I know you don’t like mock drafts, but I’m glad you wrote this article. These are fun exercises for fans, so I’m totally good with it. I also enjoyed the analysis.
I’ve read articles saying this WR class is deep. I’ve read others saying it’s not. I’m actually more worried that Gute will trade up than I am worried GB won’t walk away with a WR on day 1. Your scenario of trading down seems far wiser. The Packers have a growing problem with the salary cap that is best solved with younger, cheaper players. More picks in the early rounds would help solve for that.
I’d very much like a DT or Edge at 22, but Wyatt as 24-years old doesn’t fit the Gutekunst model. Stokes has been his oldest 1st round pick at 22.
Pickens with the 28th pick and Pierce with the 59th pick. OT with the 53rd.
Good point about Wyatt’s age. I noticed that too. I’m assuming Gutekunst wouldn’t pass on a talented defensive lineman just because he’s a little older, but he just might.
can i elect you, Michael, to be added to the Packers’ war room?
As long as I’m not asked about OTs, I think I could help. ?
“Spriggs can play.”
“Nijman can’t play.”
“Bakhtiari will be an above-average starter.”
Michael,
What’s your take on Kenyon Green? Seems like a Gutey type of linemen – big and versatile and athletic.
I’ve been focused mostly on wide receivers, but I just started looking more closely at linemen. Stay tuned.
This mock draft and the idea of trading out of round one into early two is the most sensible one I have seen. Getting a good big man early or an edge or DB is a good general rule. Ending up with a veteran receiver and still getting three or possibly four or even five choices in the first three round is a good day(s).