Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric
Eric
April 29, 2022 1:33 pm

Thanks, Michael. When London went to ATL it was clear that a WR wouldn’t be a feasible choice for a trade-up or drop to 22. Disappointing. I wondered if Gutey – who got really jumpy with Love and Savage – would get jumpy last night. Hoping he gets jumpy tonight to make sure he gets Pickens, Watson, or Pierce. For now the Pack look like a team that could get into a lot of low scoring games, a la the playoff game. With Bisaccia hopefully they’re not giving up any ST touchdowns.

Wyatt and Walker both sound good from what I’ve seen and read. Here’s a scout’s take, courtesy of McGinn, on Wyatt: “Probably the best D-lineman. He’s got everything. He’s really stout, very strong, can hold a double, dominate a single. He’s got rush skill for a big guy. He can play 3-technique and 1-technique in a 4-3 and multiple positions in a 3-4.” Coming off his best year in every statistical category. “Physically, he’s the best of these guys,” another scout said of this class of defensive linemen. “He’s as good as Geno Atkins. Three-technique. Holy f—, is he talented. He can do whatever he wants. Love that dude.”

Chris Simms raved, pre-draft, about both guys:
Start at 14 min. on this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcSHmTh-0wo&t=1169s

Start at 17 min. on this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMQa3Mogc4U&t=1449s

JJ
JJ
April 29, 2022 2:37 pm

I’m curious why WR wasn’t a feasible choice. Both New Orleans and Detroit traded up to draft Olave and Williams. If those teams were willing to pay the price to trade up, why weren’t the “all in” packers who are in desperate need for WR help?

Hopefully these guys help make the D dominant. But in a league where good offense consistently moves the ball on good defenses, it’s troubling that GB is on plan C or worse for WR in an all-in year.

William
William
April 29, 2022 2:49 pm

I don’t think it would’ve been worth the price to move up to 11 or 12 just to get Olave or Williams. I’m OK with Gutekunst staying at 22, but what I’m not OK with is him ignoring wide receiver in the 2019 and 2020 drafts and then missing on Rodgers last year. He put the Packers in this position, and now he better find a way to make things better.

eric
eric
April 29, 2022 5:42 pm

there already has been a lot of talk about the Packers first selection.. an off-ball LB.. it will likely be a topic throughout the year. that said, for the first time in a long, long time, i am optimistic about the D-line.. it looks fierce now. and, i do agree with the sentiment that good defenses translate well in the playoffs.

about WR:

i think that there are more receivers that the Packers can take than most media outlets are willing to report. i finally saw Erik Ezukanma’s name attached to a 3rd round selection in Lance Zeirlein’s mock draft today. i never understood why the media hasn’t put his name out there.. big body with ball skills, YAC skills, athleticism and a team captain. and, i like Bo Melton and Tyquon Thornton, and maybe Kevin Austin, Jr. and.. there are some TEs who can catch balls.. although it takes a while longer for them to know an offense. even if the Packers get only one pass catcher in say the 3rd round this evening.. Day 3 can still offer hope. it is going to take a village to replace Davante Adams production.. but, the Packers still have lots of picks to use. and, free agency and trade options still exist after the draft.

CJS
CJS
Reply to  eric
May 1, 2022 5:34 pm

I think Gute made the investment in an off-ball LB is because GB realized that their defense didn’t work when they didn’t have Campbell on the field. I look at Quay as the exact same situation as drafting a very young, but talented Rashaan Gary a few years back. Right around the time Quay is hitting his stride, Campbell’s age and price tag will both be too high. (same thing that happed with Za’Darious Smith)

My favorite pick in this draft was Devonte Wyatt. The Packers run D has been a joke the past few seasons. The DL just doesn’t work with Clark off the field. Dean Lowry is a highly paid “JAG”. They’d be better off re-signing Lancaster to eat a handful of run-down snaps and cutting Lowry if he won’t cut his pay in half.

Back to top
mobile desktop